Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Keep Your Eyes Safe This New Year's Eve
The cork from a champagne bottle can fly up to 50 mile per hour as it leaves the bottle. According to Doctor Kuldev Singh M.P.H., clinical correspondent of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Professor of Ophthalmology of Stanford University School of Medicine, "Incorrect popping of champagne corks is one of the most common holiday-related eye hazards. Anything that travels with such force can have a dangerous effect if it strikes your eye. Eye-related cork injuries can lead to acute glaucoma, detached retina, and corneal abrasion all of which can result in decreased vision. Many champagne cork-related injures necessitate urgent surgery to prevent significant, permanent vision loss--a terrible way to spend the holidays."
Here are a few simple steps you can follow that can help prevent eye injuries this New Year's Eve.
• Make sure the champagne is chilled to at least 45 degrees Fahrenheit before opening. The cork of warm bottle is more likely to pop unexpectedly.
• Don't shake the bottle. Shaking increases the speed at which the cork leaves the bottle.
• To open the bottle safely, hold the cork down with the palm of your hand while removing the wire hood. Point the bottle at a 45 degree angle away from yourself and from any bystanders.
• Place a towel over the entire top of the bottle and grasp the cork.
• Keep the bottle at a 45 degree angle as you slowly and firmly twist the bottle while holding the cork to break the seal. Continue to hold the cork while twisting the bottle. Continue until the cork is almost out of the neck. Counter the force of the cork using slight downward pressure just as the cork breaks free from the bottle.
• Never use a corkscrew to open a bottle of champagne or sparkling wine.
Sources:
American Academy of Opthalmology.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/174607.php
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Low Vitamin D Levels Linked to Increased Risk for Stroke, Heart Disease and Death
Researchers following 27,686 people, aged 50 and older with no history of cardiovascular disease, found that participants with low levels of vitamin D had a significantly higher risk for stroke, heart disease and death.
During the study participants were placed into three different groups based upon their levels of vitamin D: normal (more than 30 nanograms per milliliter), low (15 to 30 nanograms per milliliter), or very low (less than 15 nanograms per milliliter).
After one year of follow-up researches found that participants with very low levels of vitamin D were 77 percent more likely to die, 45 percent more likely to develop coronary artery disease and 78 percent more likely to have a stroke. As well, they were twice as likely to develop heart failure compared to people with normal vitamin D levels.
"We concluded that among patients 50 years of age or older, even a moderate deficiency of vitamin D levels was associated with developing coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and death," study co-author Heidi May, an epidemiologist with the Intermountain Medical Center in Murray, Utah, said in a news release from the center.
"This is important because vitamin D deficiency is easily treated. If increasing levels of vitamin D can decrease some risk associated with these cardiovascular diseases, it could have a significant public health impact. When you consider that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in
Because this was an observational study, a definitive link between vitamin D levels and heart disease couldn't be established, but the findings point to the need for further research, said study co-author Dr. Brent Muhlestein, director of cardiovascular research at Intermountain's Heart Institute.
"We believe the findings are important enough to now justify randomized treatment trials of supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency to determine for sure whether it can reduce the risk of heart disease," Muhlestein said in the news release.
Vitamin D is obtained from sunlight and by consuming fatty fish or fortified dairy products such as milk.
Reference: http://healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=633048
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Eye-Friendly Toys for a Safe Holiday Season
Avoid BB guns, slingshots, dart guns and arrows for children under 6. Ideally, these toys should be avoided completely, especially when there are younger children in the house. If that is not possible, supervise any child with these toys, because have the potential to be harmful. While BB’s and the darts from a dart gun may not break the skin, they are small enough to penetrate the eye and can cause blindness.
Be careful to avoid toys that may be age appropriate for an older child but could be dangerous for a younger sibling. Always supervise children in situations when they might share an inappropriate toy with a younger child.
Great toys for children under age 2 that stimulate visual development improve hand-eye coordination and demonstrate spatial relationships include:
*brightly colored mobiles
*stuffed animals
*activity gyms
*blocks, balls
*stacking and nesting toys
*buckets and measuring cups
*puzzles
*shape sorters
*musical toys
Appropriate and eye-friendly toys for children over age 2 include:
*child-sized household items like brooms
*vacuums
*rakes
*lawn mowers
*refrigerator and stove sets and outside toys like sandboxes
*riding toys and backyard gyms and swings
Some toys may simply be found to be unsafe and be recalled by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). For a list of toy recalls, call (800) 638-2772 or visit www.cpsc.gov.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Smokers Have Triple The Risk of Sight Loss
A smoker is three times more likely to develop age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) than a non smoker. In fact, ARMD is the leading cause of blindness among adults over the age of fifty. The link between smoking and ARMD has now been shown to be as strong as that between smoking and lung cancer. Non-smokers who live with smokers have been shown to have double the risk for developing ARMD.
Despite these facts, the public seems unaware of the connection between smoking and danger to their eyesight. A survey of 1023 adults in the UK showed that only 7% knew that smoking could affect their eyesight. When informed that ARMD and smoking were linked, over 41% of smokers questioned said they would quit smoking, if they thought it would harm their vision. Another 28% said they would cut down the number of cigarettes smoked per day to protect their eyesight.
The good news is that studies have shown that among smokers who have given up the habit for more than 20 years, the risk of developing ARMD is similar to that of nonsmokers. Perhaps campaigns to raise awareness about smoking and its potential to cause blindness would be more effective than those stressing its risks for heart disease and lung cancer. Campaigns in Australia and New Zealand have already started and results have been encouraging.
References:
http://www.medwire-news.md/51/38714/General_Medicine/Smokers_have_double_risk_of_sight_loss.html
http://www.medwire-news.md/51/44926/General_Medicine/Second-hand_smoke_linked_to_eye_disease.html
http://www.preventblindness.org/news/releases/091809_1.html
http://www.esrezaeian.com/armdandcnv.htm